It’s kind of sad to me that there are people out there that actually don’t believe that we went to the moon… but I guess it takes all kinds.
For those people, here is a video which claims to refute any of the edicts they cling to and indeed offers proof to the contrary. Still, people are going to believe what they want to believe…
Oh, and if that doesn’t do it, how about a video from NASA of dropping a hammer and feather on the moon. That is the only place they can fall at the exact same rate because of the lack of atmosphere:
{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }
I Strongly Believe that they landed on the moon. Yet there are Some Idiots out there with ridiculous conspiracy theories.. yet some of them are convincing in different ways. but this prooved that they did land on the moon. thankyou! I Rate this 5/5
Hmmm….I wonder why someone would call this a hoax. The whole world seen them on the moon. It would be hard to fake this back in the day it’s more authentic than anything else done in history.
After 1977, why would US/Russia send another mission to the moon? definitely the space technology is more advance today? furthermore moon is 384,000 km away from earth – meaning the Apollo carrys 768,000km fuel on it back? does it make sense?
Hmmm. Let’s see…
Why wouldn’t we go back even though our technology is better? Because it’s as expensive as hell!!! I mean, why don’t we dig a 5 mile hole into the earth and tap the heat of molten lava for energy? Just because you have the technology to do something doesn’t mean it’s economically feasible. Plus, there is nothing on the moon to make it a financially viable trip. It’s not like it’s made of gold and we can mine it. It’s a big freakin rock.
As far as fuel goes, perhaps you are unfamiliar with the term “space”? It means NOTHING. As in vacuum. You don’t need to burn a rocket to keep going once you are in motion. You only need to burn it to stop. So once you’ve broken free of the Earth’s gravitational field and you’re traveling at, oh… 17,000 miles per hour, you’ll keep doing it until you reverse thrusters.
So what was your point again?
John P.
It seems so real!!!!
I really beleive they did land on the moon. In these times its the technology battle going on that some crackpots really consider it a ‘hoax’ which is really insane!!!
Just make a fake feather out of metal.
It will fall at the same rate of acceleration as a hammer in atmosphere.
The video is so bad you can hardly tell it IS a feather, let alone real or fake.
No, you couldn’t and no it doesn’t.
You couldn’t make it the exact same weight of a hammer and the same size and thinness of a feather.
And even if you could the hammer would still drop faster in a Atmosphere. Have you heard of Air Resistance? If you havn’t check out how a hang-glider works.
Anyway man HAS landed on the moon and it is an insult to all the men and women who worked incredibly hard on getting it there and back.
I like the part in the video where they say “we can’t duplicate the intensity of the sun here in the night desert”
Why not?
Why not do the experiment during the day? The sun’s intensity should be quite easy to duplicate, no? Then they would be using the same light source as was supposedly used in all the moon pictures, THE SUN. Why do they have to use a studio spotlight at night? Maybe because that’s what was used in all the pictures?
It’s ridiculous, “Here let’s prove these pictures were lit with the sun and not with a spotlight by doing some tests with a spotlight.” Does any one else see the problem here? Shouldn’t the tests use the sun? They did the same thing on “Myth Busters”, they brought in a spot light “to act as the sun” as they “proved” that shadows could diverge. It make me cringe, how dumb do they think we are?
Shadows (on the same planet) cannot diverge from a single light source millions of miles away, it is impossible.
Still skeptical.
No, the mythbusters were trying to prove that the pictures were lit by a single light source, as many conspiracists claim that the shadows would divulge due to multiple light sources, i.e. studio lights. They proved that with a single light source and by changing the topograhy (layout, structure) of the terrain the shadows appear to have divulged when viewed from the side because of the sloping terrain, of course from above they would still be parallel.
You conspiracists think you’ve got it all worked out, but you just don’t think things through!
Still sceptical?
The video of the feather and hammer proves nothing, who knows what those objects were really made out of, not to mention trick photography or even a man made vacuum on a studio set with footage tampered with.. it could be absolutely anything.
We only know what the media tells us and what the government tells them.
a man made vacuum… really..? that doesnt disregard gravitational pull..
If they have landed on the moon before, how come in the last forty years, with all the advances in science , have we not gone back?
Why would we go back? NASA and all the people involved with the moon landings proved it could be done and that that moon is a large common rock. Do you feel the earth is flat? What about Big Foot?