<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Man Loses Battle to DIGG Again!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/27/one-man-loses-battle-to-digg-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/27/one-man-loses-battle-to-digg-again/</link>
	<description>Specialization is for Insects.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:44:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thepilatesbiz</title>
		<link>http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/27/one-man-loses-battle-to-digg-again/comment-page-1/#comment-99536</link>
		<dc:creator>thepilatesbiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/27/one-man-loses-battle-to-digg-again/#comment-99536</guid>
		<description>Glorious data here. This fascinating put up made me smile. Possibly should you throw in a couple of pictures itll make the whole thing extra interesting. Anyway, in my language, there usually are not much good source like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glorious data here. This fascinating put up made me smile. Possibly should you throw in a couple of pictures itll make the whole thing extra interesting. Anyway, in my language, there usually are not much good source like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bertram Elizarraras</title>
		<link>http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/27/one-man-loses-battle-to-digg-again/comment-page-1/#comment-93427</link>
		<dc:creator>Bertram Elizarraras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 07:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/27/one-man-loses-battle-to-digg-again/#comment-93427</guid>
		<description>fantastic issues altogether, you simply gained a brand new reader. What may you recommend about your post that you just made a few days in the past? Any certain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fantastic issues altogether, you simply gained a brand new reader. What may you recommend about your post that you just made a few days in the past? Any certain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John P.</title>
		<link>http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/27/one-man-loses-battle-to-digg-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15401</link>
		<dc:creator>John P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 18:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/27/one-man-loses-battle-to-digg-again/#comment-15401</guid>
		<description>Well, when this site was going through all of that turmoil it wasn&#039;t paying for it&#039;s self either, but I&#039;m fortunate enough to be able to support the cost just as a hobby.  

Having said that I highly recommend you look into the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nopuedocreer.com/quelohayaninventado/?page_id=211&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;More Money plugin&lt;/a&gt;.  You can use it to selectively display ads to only search engine visitors - who are extremely fickle anyway and likely to leave the moment they arrive on your site.  So you might as well give them some google ads to select from and make a few cents.

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, when this site was going through all of that turmoil it wasn&#8217;t paying for it&#8217;s self either, but I&#8217;m fortunate enough to be able to support the cost just as a hobby.  </p>
<p>Having said that I highly recommend you look into the <a href="http://www.nopuedocreer.com/quelohayaninventado/?page_id=211" rel="nofollow">More Money plugin</a>.  You can use it to selectively display ads to only search engine visitors &#8211; who are extremely fickle anyway and likely to leave the moment they arrive on your site.  So you might as well give them some google ads to select from and make a few cents.</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urbanist</title>
		<link>http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/27/one-man-loses-battle-to-digg-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15209</link>
		<dc:creator>Urbanist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/27/one-man-loses-battle-to-digg-again/#comment-15209</guid>
		<description>The irony for me is: Web Urbanist has been Dugg a number of times recently, but because it still isn&#039;t monetized really at all there is no way to even pay for upgraded hosting - so it&#039;s all about caching and praying Dreamhost doesn&#039;t throttle it ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The irony for me is: Web Urbanist has been Dugg a number of times recently, but because it still isn&#8217;t monetized really at all there is no way to even pay for upgraded hosting &#8211; so it&#8217;s all about caching and praying Dreamhost doesn&#8217;t throttle it ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/27/one-man-loses-battle-to-digg-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1189</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 05:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/27/one-man-loses-battle-to-digg-again/#comment-1189</guid>
		<description>Yikes.  Thanks for the details. I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll have to worry about that for a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes.  Thanks for the details. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll have to worry about that for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Man</title>
		<link>http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/27/one-man-loses-battle-to-digg-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1178</link>
		<dc:creator>The Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 04:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/27/one-man-loses-battle-to-digg-again/#comment-1178</guid>
		<description>Wuz - Yes, fear the Digg Reaper! :-)

Eric,

Thanks for the congrats!  This is actually the 3rd major Digging in the last few weeks.  The article you reference followed my learnings from my first good thrashing.  

On Feb 2, 2007 my &lt;a href=&quot;http://onemansblog.com/2007/02/07/10-worst-drivers-ever-caught-on-video/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;10 Worst Drivers Ever Caught on Video&lt;/a&gt; was Dugg over 800 times (currently 832) and it really rattled my nerves.  I detailed the experience in the article you mentioned.

I then did all of the things that you read about and it actually did help when it came to round 2:

On Mar 6 the pounding began on &lt;a href=&quot;http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/06/why-celebrity-photos-look-so-great/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Why Celebrity Photos Look So Great&lt;/a&gt;.  This Dugg up to over 1500 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://digg.com/design/Why_Celebrity_Photos_Look_So_Great&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;currently 1547&lt;/a&gt;).  Despite receiving far more Diggs and traffic, the server handled the load surprisingly well.  I used my trick of replacing the page in question with a static HTML document, and the remainder of the site seemed navigable for most of the time it was under seige.

This brings us to yesterday&#039;s all out assault on &lt;a href=&quot;http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/26/how-id-hack-your-weak-passwords/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;How Iâ€™d Hack Your Weak Passwords &lt;/a&gt;.  :-) 

The intensity of this particular Digging far outpaced the previous two.  Or that&#039;s how it seemed to me at least.  No amount of rebooting of the server, caching with WP Cache (I cranked the expiration times up to 100,000 seconds) or anything else would keep the dynamic pages serving.  We simply had to wait for the article to get off the Top 10 list before things settled down a bit.

Even as I write this, the traffic continues to roll in and the article is currently up to over 2,500 Diggs.

So, the bottom line is, yes the things I did previously helped, but clearly I didn&#039;t do enough.  If I had installed a PHP caching program it might have helped a bit, but I think the main problem was that the database was overwhelmed.  

Once I get migrated over to my new server I&#039;m going to find a pro to optimize my database settings, install a PHP cache and generally make sure the server is doing all it can.  I am also in the process of writing my own theme for the site from scratch which will eliminate as much extraneous load from the server as possible.

My goal is for the pages to load in 1/4 the time they are currently taking... that is, when they aren&#039;t under attack!

Take care,

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wuz &#8211; Yes, fear the Digg Reaper! :-)</p>
<p>Eric,</p>
<p>Thanks for the congrats!  This is actually the 3rd major Digging in the last few weeks.  The article you reference followed my learnings from my first good thrashing.  </p>
<p>On Feb 2, 2007 my <a href="http://onemansblog.com/2007/02/07/10-worst-drivers-ever-caught-on-video/" rel="nofollow">10 Worst Drivers Ever Caught on Video</a> was Dugg over 800 times (currently 832) and it really rattled my nerves.  I detailed the experience in the article you mentioned.</p>
<p>I then did all of the things that you read about and it actually did help when it came to round 2:</p>
<p>On Mar 6 the pounding began on <a href="http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/06/why-celebrity-photos-look-so-great/" rel="nofollow">Why Celebrity Photos Look So Great</a>.  This Dugg up to over 1500 (<a href="http://digg.com/design/Why_Celebrity_Photos_Look_So_Great" rel="nofollow">currently 1547</a>).  Despite receiving far more Diggs and traffic, the server handled the load surprisingly well.  I used my trick of replacing the page in question with a static HTML document, and the remainder of the site seemed navigable for most of the time it was under seige.</p>
<p>This brings us to yesterday&#8217;s all out assault on <a href="http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/26/how-id-hack-your-weak-passwords/" rel="nofollow">How Iâ€™d Hack Your Weak Passwords </a>.  :-) </p>
<p>The intensity of this particular Digging far outpaced the previous two.  Or that&#8217;s how it seemed to me at least.  No amount of rebooting of the server, caching with WP Cache (I cranked the expiration times up to 100,000 seconds) or anything else would keep the dynamic pages serving.  We simply had to wait for the article to get off the Top 10 list before things settled down a bit.</p>
<p>Even as I write this, the traffic continues to roll in and the article is currently up to over 2,500 Diggs.</p>
<p>So, the bottom line is, yes the things I did previously helped, but clearly I didn&#8217;t do enough.  If I had installed a PHP caching program it might have helped a bit, but I think the main problem was that the database was overwhelmed.  </p>
<p>Once I get migrated over to my new server I&#8217;m going to find a pro to optimize my database settings, install a PHP cache and generally make sure the server is doing all it can.  I am also in the process of writing my own theme for the site from scratch which will eliminate as much extraneous load from the server as possible.</p>
<p>My goal is for the pages to load in 1/4 the time they are currently taking&#8230; that is, when they aren&#8217;t under attack!</p>
<p>Take care,</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/27/one-man-loses-battle-to-digg-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 03:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/27/one-man-loses-battle-to-digg-again/#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>First - congratulations on the enormous number of Diggs!  

Second - I think one of the first posts of yours that I read was about how to speed up a site in order to &lt;a href=&quot;http://onemansblog.com/2007/02/15/how-to-survive-a-good-slashdotting-or-digging/#more-799&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;survive a good Digging&lt;/a&gt;.  Did that stuff help this last time around, or are 1700 Diggs tough to survive no matter what you do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First &#8211; congratulations on the enormous number of Diggs!  </p>
<p>Second &#8211; I think one of the first posts of yours that I read was about how to speed up a site in order to <a href="http://onemansblog.com/2007/02/15/how-to-survive-a-good-slashdotting-or-digging/#more-799" rel="nofollow">survive a good Digging</a>.  Did that stuff help this last time around, or are 1700 Diggs tough to survive no matter what you do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wuz</title>
		<link>http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/27/one-man-loses-battle-to-digg-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1167</link>
		<dc:creator>wuz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemansblog.com/2007/03/27/one-man-loses-battle-to-digg-again/#comment-1167</guid>
		<description>LOL, be afraid, be very afraid, for Digg cometh 4 u...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, be afraid, be very afraid, for Digg cometh 4 u&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

