I think by now everyone knows what side of the environmental debate I’m on. And I’m aware that I have friends and relatives that still have differing opinions on the matter. When we discuss it I normally argue that the consequences of being wrong about global warming are potentially far, far worse than the cost of taking some unnecessary action.
Well, along comes this video that some guy made (I don’t even know who, so if anyone finds out please let me know) which demonstrates the best rational argument I’ve seen to date. I honestly defy you to watch this and then come up with a VALID response.
Now, here is the deal. If anyone can refute this line of reasoning with a similarly strong, yet opposing, argument then I will personally make a video response of that argument and post it myself. But be warned… if you post a weak argument in response I will break it down personally! :-)
So, that’s the challenge. Watch this video, try to be a skeptic, and if you can come up with the counter argument let’s hear it. Otherwise, admit this is a valid argument and let’s move on! ;-)