Posted on Nov 08, 2007 - 1:10am by John P. in Philosophy, Thoughts
The other day I sat down to watch The Princess Bride for about the 10,000th time. Man that is a great movie! Anyway, when I was watching the part where Vizzini, the Sicilian, was answering the question as to how smart he is, he said:
“Let me put it this way. Have you ever heard of Plato, Aristotle, Socrates? Morons.”
So, I decided to mosey on over to the Interwebs and find a list of people with the highest IQ ever measured, and lo and behold I couldn’t find one! So for the sake of future searchers, I compiled the following information. Enjoy.
In order to establish a baseline knowledge, IQ (intelligence quotient) is a score derived from attempting to measure the actual mental horsepower of any given individual. Personally I place little value in IQ tests, but I do acknowledge that they are an indicator of some common potential success factors, so we’ll leave it at that.
The “average” IQ is by definition 100, so if you score below that you are dumber than average, and above it means smarter than average.
In 1926, psychologist Dr. Catherine Morris Cox – who had been assisted by Dr. Lewis M. Terman, Dr. Florence L. Goodenaugh, and Dr. Kate Gordon – published a study “of the most eminent men and women” who had lived between 1450 and 1850 to estimate what their IQs might have been. Data from that study as well as other sources around the net were compiled to form the following list. Please drop me a comment if you have additions or corrections (make sure and cite sources).
|
|
|
Also, see Wikipedia’s list of Universal Genius (Polymaths).
Now that you’ve read all about these really smart people, surely you want to know how you compare? Well, set aside a full 40 minutes and go through this test to determine where you are on the evolutionary chain.
Select the image below and the clock starts when the test loads, so be prepared in order to get the full 40 minutes. Trust me, you’re gonna need it! Oh, and if you answer “A” on every question, you get a 72! (a=72, b=65, c=65, d=65, e=72, f=72, g= 65, and h=65 – Only The Man would help you cheat on an IQ test!)

EDIT: I received the following e-mail from Mike, a former school psychologist of 30 years, regarding the validity of this IQ Test:
…one of the better and possibly fairly accurate IQ tests (11/8/07) seen on the net. Two caveats:
1. This test evaluates visual spatial reasoning skills, and not verbal which some may say would be a bias toward guys.
2. This test does not assess processing speed and ability to make quick/accurate and perhaps more c creative choices.For different view of intelligence away from IQ try: Theory of Multiple Intelligences
If it turns out you are a Genius, join a club! Here’s how to hook up with your intellectual peers:
By the way, why is it that most of the high IQ society Web sites suck so bad? And if I may inquire additionally, why is it that none of them have sections on their sites where they are actually teaching people by translating highly complex issues into understandable language?
Now, for the rest of us (I score just above a moderately intelligent canine, but just below a porpoise), you can just join the One Man’s Blog Society for the Incredibly Average. Believe me, we have a lot more fun around here.
I use the "No Adverts for Friends" plugin by Donncha O Caoimh
Pages: « 1 … 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] Show All
shutup my iq is 114 and yet i learn by sleeping in class and i’m lazy and have a semi-photographic memory
memory isn’t photographic in the slightest – even people who can easily recall lists of 70 numbers have to use memory techniques like mnemonics and chunking. Buy yourself a neuroscience textbook
You seem to have left William James Sidis off your list.
He was estimated to have an IQ between 250-300. You can reference this from the wiki article on him.
Seemed to be a remarkable mind but lived a difficult life falling short of his potential.
I agree i researched this William and he was a VERY bright man.
127 in Standard deviation 16
so close to mensa.
Mine is 121((16) 119 (15) 131(24)) but it doesn’t really matter.
IQ only determines Capablity and not determination. I seen alot of people with low IQ but very high Determination that out smarted the High IQ people. W/O determination you really mess up your life. ‘Smiles r us’
in standerd deviation 16 this test calculated my iq as being 139 whereas on a standerd deviation 15 test i did on a different websit calculated my iq as 159. this system seems totally screwed up
i can tell you my iq is 160 i’m 15 that’s great
jmg has the same initials as me thats cool. nyway i just did the test and i got above end 140 what does above end mean? to be honest i thought the test was a bit easy for a proper iq test could someone tell me if there is a good test on the internet.
above end means you answered wel to every single question just as me it means your very intelligent that’s good for you.try this test and tell me your results it’s on this site:www.genius societyiqtest.org ad tell me yuor, results.
Hey ivan just to let you know i could not find the test you recommended as im new to these but i did take the high iq society test and scored a 160+. I’m not so sure about the validity of this test but it did seem fairly mainstream.
excuse me john that was an error the site is highiqsociety.org .i wish you good luck.and what was the name of the test you took?
I scored 145 in tests in primary school, and a in facebook test that recently came my way I scored 139, so all the years of living haven’t dsulled the intellect too much, apparently! I’ve also been working on and off as a bouncer and bodyguard (whenever cashflow is a bit tight) for the past 15 years. I do feel Im prettier than Mr Langan, and at 6ft 5in & 125kg maybe physically better equipped for the job too. One ything is for certain, being intelligent has helped me defuse many potentially really ugly incidents, so I am sure Mr Langan is really good at his job too.
I read that Leonardo DaVinci’s IQ was supposed to be 205.
no one really knows his iq i’ve heard too it was 205 and also 220 and also 190 ad also 180 that’s so silly .
I have a cuestion, I have been taken some kinds of IQ test of diferents pages; and i have been gotten grades between 118 and 151; so i fell confused because i think that its a range so large; whats the meaning oof that??? how i can know my real IQ??? i hope so find a answer; thank you
Note: Sorry if my english is awful;In fact im from Mexico
Well when it just gives you one number it is basically a bs IQ test. Every genius thinks in their on special way. A basic test like this will just give you a basic IQ that will have no correlation to other tests most likely.
I got 143 on a standard deviation of 24. (a true IQ test normally ranges from I guess 10 or so to 210. 210 is the IQ of the smartest man in the world, and IQ’s are based on your intelligence with other people. I mean ultimately people are going to get every question right. After that it’s who thinks the fastest I assume. That is what I learned in psychology at least)
this said that my iq is 180 you guys should be ashamed. im 12 by the way.
My IQ is 224 and I’m 6 1/2 months old, beat that.
that’s too funny and silly at the same time you are too low i’m 3 months old and my iq is 257 ha ha ha ha it sucks.
stop lying that’s not really cool this test doesn’t give your iq score above 160 you should be ashamed.
If anyones IQ was above 50, you for certain would not be posting these dumb comments. very few people have above 95 and i am sur emost of dont either!
The average IQ is 101 Cattell A. The average Asian IQ is closer to 104-105 while the average African (not African-American) IQ, people who have at best a limited access to learning is right around 85. So you could not be any more wrong in that very few people have above 95. In fact, between 95 and 105 is where the majority would place on a bell curve.
BTW, anyone who would actually consider the validity of an online IQ test just shouldn’t even be reading this.
Societies such as MENSA make you take a validated, sit-in test for confirmation, I am a member, and the questions on an online test bear absolutely no resemblance to an IQ test. They are more like, “take the online quiz to see if you should have stayed in grade school.”
salut comment allez-vous gloria c’est comme si vous vouliez écrire 150 et 195 .and i don’t understand the end of your comment.and you understand at least what i write ,i don’t guess the sens of your comment excuse me.
Let me make this very clear to everyone. Everyone on the internet lies about their iq, do not listen to a songle one of them.
This so called IQ record is COMPLETELY false, I agree with the chart, but the 15th highest IQ alive is 154? Wrong… That’s totally wrong…
those are notable people with high iqs, not highest
My IQ is 160. IQ tests are totally pointless. Instead of sitting around taking dumb IQ tests, go do something productive with your life. Its more important if a person gets a chance to overturn humanity’s conception of the universe than to have an IQ of 180.
I love how many people on this blog proclaim that they have IQ’s above the 99 percentile. It makes me laugh. Most people who allegedly state that their IQs’ are that high are lying and are insecure. For those of you on this blog, who think IQ tests are pointless, look at it this way. How would schools be able to distinguish children, who might have lower abilities in cognition from those with average to above average cognition? In other words, how would schools know which one of their students would need special education compared the rest? Think about it! IQ tests measure aptitudes for problem solving, complex thought, and sometimes memory, which are all key aspects for academic success. In my opinion, people who infer that IQ tests are invalid and pointless need to take a second look.
P.S. There has been a lot of dumb comments on this blog.
My IQ = 178
Personally, I think IQ tests are flawed for two reasons:
1. Most intelligence tests depend largely on where you’ve been brought up, and how much education you’ve had. So, if you’ve received very little schooling, it will definitely reflect on the IQ test.
2. The vast majority of intelligence tests only measure specific sets of skills that one would define as being relevant to one’s own culture. Therefore, knowing that intelligence tests base their results primarily on cultural leanings, I think it’s safe to say that most IQ tests are, well, not inaccurate, but they don’t give you the overall picture in terms of general cognitive ability.
Pattern-recognition tests on the other hand, i.e., Ravens matrices, like the test that was posted above, exhibit some degree of reliability that would probably outshine most language based tests because of their efficacy to cross cultural boundaries.
Anyway, that’s just my two cents. Peace.