Comments on: The Massive List of Genius – People With the Highest IQ http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/ Specialization is for Insects. Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:36:51 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Jundiame http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-11/#comment-57572 Jundiame Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:34:38 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-57572 I guess the greatest man of them all is Nikola Tesla. The inventor, The Genius, Who was far ahead of his time. Too bad he doesn't receive any recognition for his great contribution to humanity. If you dont know him just google the name... You will realize your using his invention every day. I guess the greatest man of them all is Nikola Tesla. The inventor, The Genius, Who was far ahead of his time. Too bad he doesn’t receive any recognition for his great contribution to humanity. If you dont know him just google the name… You will realize your using his invention every day.

]]> By: Dedra http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-11/#comment-57411 Dedra Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:39:48 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-57411 I had a score of 170 on the vocabulary section of the new WISC-R. No one knew what to do as such a score had was unseen. I am really odd believe me. I know that others think I am far from social. This is an attempt. Ha I had a score of 170 on the vocabulary section of the new WISC-R. No one knew what to do as such a score had was unseen. I am really odd believe me. I know that others think I am far from social. This is an attempt. Ha

]]> By: Allan Spacey http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-11/#comment-57347 Allan Spacey Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:35:12 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-57347 Hmm...so you've an iq of 120...if you do, then either 1) you've really thought that out or 2) binded together certain ideas produced by others. As this second version invalidate deep thought, it means you're lying. Therefore,you've either 1) got an inferiority complex in development and try to show your intelligence to others, or 2)are trying to get more popular by closing the gap(so you're smart). But if you're not smart, you wouldn't be able to coherently(though loosely) expressing all that stuff, which you depict as easy. Therefore you're 1)Smart and fucking around doing nothing or 2)Smart and trying to help us. But since then you would do a damn synthesis, you're smart and in trouble.(trying to help us for some personal, no-good=fuck-around reason).Now, for the initial nr 1) You're really thought out: then congratulations you'll do something really valuable, don't be sad about iq, you've got H.A and C. so will be a genius somehow. Try "The Complete Guide to Genius", "The Einstein Factor", "The Genius Formula" and "Genius Frequency" and you'll increase it enough, besides it's just a test. Now for no 2)...Well, if it's so great, use The CTMU to solve whatever problem you've got. However, since you're unpractical and have certain inconsistencies with "trying to help" or "using your time" or "trying to be smart" yet nor doing a synthesis I'd say you're immature, merely using those initial patterns( trying to use your mind for some mild if slightly beneficial to you purpose) therefore either a teenager or someone who's been blocked in intellectual development for some time. First, use some mild but central activity to get out of depression. Next, do hard things and valuable to you. Next, solve the damn problem(s) or ask for damn solutions,otherwise you'll die a crappy piece of shit like so many others. I'd estimate your adult-level iq at between 135 and 150(probably 141-147). Mine is 134 and I'm in the "basic logical reasoning" mood. Bye Hmm…so you’ve an iq of 120…if you do, then either 1) you’ve really thought that out or
2) binded together certain ideas produced by others. As this second version invalidate deep thought, it means you’re lying. Therefore,you’ve either 1) got an inferiority complex in development and try to show your intelligence to others, or 2)are trying to get more popular by closing the gap(so you’re smart). But if you’re not smart, you wouldn’t be able to coherently(though loosely) expressing all that stuff, which you depict as easy. Therefore you’re 1)Smart and fucking around doing nothing or 2)Smart and trying to help us. But since then you would do a damn synthesis, you’re smart and in trouble.(trying to help us for some personal, no-good=fuck-around reason).Now, for the initial nr 1) You’re really thought out: then congratulations you’ll do something really valuable, don’t be sad about iq, you’ve got H.A and C. so will be a genius somehow. Try “The Complete Guide to Genius”, “The Einstein Factor”, “The Genius Formula” and “Genius Frequency” and you’ll increase it enough, besides it’s just a test.
Now for no 2)…Well, if it’s so great, use The CTMU to solve whatever problem you’ve got. However, since you’re unpractical and have certain inconsistencies with “trying to help” or “using your time” or “trying to be smart” yet nor doing a synthesis I’d say you’re immature, merely using those initial patterns( trying to use your mind for some mild if slightly beneficial to you purpose) therefore either a teenager or someone who’s been blocked in intellectual development for some time. First, use some mild but central activity to get out of depression. Next, do hard things and valuable to you. Next, solve the damn problem(s) or ask for damn solutions,otherwise you’ll die a crappy piece of shit like so many others. I’d estimate your adult-level iq at between 135 and 150(probably 141-147). Mine is 134 and I’m in the “basic logical reasoning” mood. Bye

]]> By: Brian http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-11/#comment-57286 Brian Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:13:49 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-57286 Intro:I know it's long and I know it must beget a synthesis. I'm bad at synthesis. The ideas presented here are very valuable and well-thought, if loose. So if someone can apply an essentialization to them without inconsiderately ruling them out, I think that action would be far more in tune with the general purpose of what you said and the guiding-principles you stated, and I (probably also others) would really appreciate it. First:Strange comment (the assumption that action and iq are inconsistent), since knowledge is merely a higher order of action by the rules of mind-reality relationship inference, and, though theoretically not accurate, iq is the most scientifically valid indication of one's ability to acquire this knowledge. I agree however that highly able people can prove this ability in many systems that require it (science,mathematics,philosophy and their various fields and original implications) and that in order to truly validate it by making use of it you need more of what is on the same abstraction or basic-determinant level as iq. For example, consciousness and associative horizon are necessary for any truly brilliant (genius-level) "activity" of any order and while iq is also a requirement and dictates what particular level of intellect one can operate on, the others are just as powerful and vital as whatever iq measures. Also, that at any iq level (beyond 125, merely because any valuable/socially acknowledged system is up there) where the quantity of consciousness and associative horizon hold in the same genius-generating relationship, one can produce very valuable works with the restriction of their specific iq (dammit). Also, if you have a too high or low C or A.H you'll get into psychotic or neurotic or whatever behavior, and if the relationship is not considered, people with a high iq, when they do things normal for their level of C/A.H, they are labeled psychotic or such, because these indeed are so for the other's level, but not because of the value in itself (which, as you well pointed out, is stupid) but because of The Relationship's parameters. For example, I merely have an iq of 121, but am very tenacious and careful, curious and creative etc. with what I do and think (if I had Rick The Stripper...The Nude Model...The-you name it you get it-'s 170+ iq I'd have long done something, yet when I try to understand The CTMU or Quantum Field computation I'm in "too deep" and can't breathe though I'd be willing to spend years working on such valuable things!"). Now a cookie for listening this long:http://www.iqtest.sk/index.php?jazyk=en&akcia=odkazy&PHPSESSID=e8b5cae6d88fe22a07e05fefa952debe just search. Everything's here. EVERYTHING. Now "lil iq's" like me will go back to improving psychology and economics, forming spiritual groups, building institutions for founding brilliant people and a group of good-willed people here, but nothing of eternal value, nothing that REALLY MATTERS... while Rick's and the people who yell: "I've a huge iq so I won't stand you monkeys with your academics and stupid society anymore" ignoring all psychological rules, the easiness with which they could succeed and DO something, even to change things, locally, as they see is best and using their potential to get us "limited people" to perceive them as worthy of such (since how the hell do we know it, after all, with all people like you sittin' around contemplating your own sublimity etc) will get to sit a lifetime in a couch thinking about how smart they are or how they wished they could be normal...what they don't see is that being normal means having a consciousness(ehem...) and A.H matching their iq, MORONS!(to them). So...think about it a while...think...it is what matters, not "iq". Also: 1.The max iq score is 240, as measured by Paul Cooijman's Isis test(double my own) 2.As your iq gets higher, the more of life you can understand and as you go upper you become deeper in thought, complex-able(in all senses) and understanding,faster and (curiously) more sensitive and better able to respond to what you perceive as valuable(also the ability to determine that and other life-principles in whatever form). But the quantitative difference also entails(implies or generates in perfect co-inclusion) a qualitative one, contrary to common belief. 3.Don't blame them (hiqers) but support or ignore them. It's much more effective in all ways for you, him and society, as there are problems and processes that they can solve or create and that can't be solved/created by other people, and are thus a neccesary part of what exists( most of your valuable thoughts and comforts are permitted by the creations of the C+H.A-high part of them.) 4.(long)People who just met with intelligence think that their half-blindedness (as opposed to the total darkness before) is all that there is(seems rational, how to find out it isn't if you couldn't ever before perceive anything else and don't get you're sick), affirming their personality ( an advanced form of child-like self-referentiality due to the inability to mentally construct another view and the sluggish struggle with binding together all the patterns you randomly gathered and distinctly used over time) and giving up (it's very easy you know, to negate, harder is to negate the negation) on whatever doesn't fit their immediate and often very restrictive use of basic logical relationships, therefore denying God, the mental nature of reality etc. It's strange why so many smart people,like Newton himself, like Christopher Langan, like Emanuel Swedenborg and Kant affirm it, and that the "proofs" used to outline paradoxes regarding God's existence (or to prove it, for that matter, unfortunately) are themselves paradoxical or based on false assumptions. It is indeed true that religion is largely based on the illogical literization of metaphorical aspects of their respective doctrines, but also that the God concept is merely a concept (...) used by mystics and religion central-figures(illuminated) to bring in the view of common man the universal consciousness, which is replaced in the mind of people with the image of a judging God watching you from behind the clouds. Then there is the use of instinct and the ego by "leaders" to invent problems regarding every little contradictory observation of superficial differences that serve as vessels for manipulation, wars, enslavement, getting rid of unfavorable "slaves" etc and propagate contradictory, primitive dogmas. Which of course piss off people who aren't completely ignorant. That doesn't invalidate, but place certain logical necessities on the "God" concept, which lead us further to ultimately form a model of reality in which the relationship between mind and reality, aka God and matter or religion and science, is made explicit and central. Such is the nature of The CTMU as I understood it Intro:I know it’s long and I know it must beget a synthesis. I’m bad at synthesis. The ideas presented here are very valuable and well-thought, if loose. So if someone can apply an essentialization to them without inconsiderately ruling them out, I think that action would be far more in tune with the general purpose of what you said and the guiding-principles you stated, and I (probably also others) would really appreciate it.

First:Strange comment (the assumption that action and iq are inconsistent), since knowledge is merely a higher order of action by the rules of mind-reality relationship inference, and, though theoretically not accurate, iq is the most scientifically valid indication of one’s ability to acquire this knowledge. I agree however that highly able people can prove this ability in many systems that require it (science,mathematics,philosophy and their various fields and original implications) and that in order to truly validate it by making use of it you need more of what is on the same abstraction or basic-determinant level as iq.

For example, consciousness and associative horizon are necessary for any truly brilliant (genius-level) “activity” of any order and while iq is also a requirement and dictates what particular level of intellect one can operate on, the others are just as powerful and vital as whatever iq measures. Also, that at any iq level (beyond 125, merely because any valuable/socially acknowledged system is up there) where the quantity of consciousness and associative horizon hold in the same genius-generating relationship, one can produce very valuable works with the restriction of their specific iq (dammit).

Also, if you have a too high or low C or A.H you’ll get into psychotic or neurotic or whatever behavior, and if the relationship is not considered, people with a high iq, when they do things normal for their level of C/A.H, they are labeled psychotic or such, because these indeed are so for the other’s level, but not because of the value in itself (which, as you well pointed out, is stupid) but because of The Relationship’s parameters. For example, I merely have an iq of 121, but am very tenacious and careful, curious and creative etc. with what I do and think (if I had Rick The Stripper…The Nude Model…The-you name it you get it-’s 170+ iq I’d have long done something, yet when I try to understand The CTMU or Quantum Field computation I’m in “too deep” and can’t breathe though I’d be willing to spend years working on such valuable things!”).

Now a cookie for listening this long:http://www.iqtest.sk/index.php?jazyk=en&akcia=odkazy&PHPSESSID=e8b5cae6d88fe22a07e05fefa952debe
just search. Everything’s here. EVERYTHING. Now “lil iq’s” like me will go back to improving psychology and economics, forming spiritual groups, building institutions for founding brilliant people and a group of good-willed people here, but nothing of eternal value, nothing that REALLY MATTERS… while Rick’s and the people who yell: “I’ve a huge iq so I won’t stand you monkeys with your academics and stupid society anymore” ignoring all psychological rules, the easiness with which they could succeed and DO something, even to change things, locally, as they see is best and using their potential to get us “limited people” to perceive them as worthy of such (since how the hell do we know it, after all, with all people like you sittin’ around contemplating your own sublimity etc) will get to sit a lifetime in a couch thinking about how smart they are or how they wished they could be normal…what they don’t see is that being normal means having a consciousness(ehem…) and A.H matching their iq, MORONS!(to them). So…think about it a while…think…it is what matters, not “iq”.

Also: 1.The max iq score is 240, as measured by Paul Cooijman’s Isis test(double my own)

2.As your iq gets higher, the more of life you can understand and as you go upper you become deeper in thought, complex-able(in all senses) and understanding,faster and (curiously) more sensitive and better able to respond to what you perceive as valuable(also the ability to determine that and other life-principles in whatever form). But the quantitative difference also entails(implies or generates in perfect co-inclusion) a qualitative one, contrary to common belief.

3.Don’t blame them (hiqers) but support or ignore them. It’s much more effective in all ways for you, him and society, as there are problems and processes that they can solve or create and that can’t be solved/created by other people, and are thus a neccesary part of what exists( most of your valuable thoughts and comforts are permitted by the creations of the C+H.A-high part of them.)

4.(long)People who just met with intelligence think that their half-blindedness (as opposed to the total darkness before) is all that there is(seems rational, how to find out it isn’t if you couldn’t ever before perceive anything else and don’t get you’re sick), affirming their personality ( an advanced form of child-like self-referentiality due to the inability to mentally construct another view and the sluggish struggle with binding together all the patterns you randomly gathered and distinctly used over time) and giving up (it’s very easy you know, to negate, harder is to negate the negation) on whatever doesn’t fit their immediate and often very restrictive use of basic logical relationships, therefore denying God, the mental nature of reality etc. It’s strange why so many smart people,like Newton himself, like Christopher Langan, like Emanuel Swedenborg and Kant affirm it, and that the “proofs” used to outline paradoxes regarding God’s existence (or to prove it, for that matter, unfortunately) are themselves paradoxical or based on false assumptions. It is indeed true that religion is largely based on the illogical literization of metaphorical aspects of their respective doctrines, but also that the God concept is merely a concept (…) used by mystics and religion central-figures(illuminated) to bring in the view of common man the universal consciousness, which is replaced in the mind of people with the image of a judging God watching you from behind the clouds. Then there is the use of instinct and the ego by “leaders” to invent problems regarding every little contradictory observation of superficial differences that serve as vessels for manipulation, wars, enslavement, getting rid of unfavorable “slaves” etc and propagate contradictory, primitive dogmas. Which of course piss off people who aren’t completely ignorant. That doesn’t invalidate, but place certain logical necessities on the “God” concept, which lead us further to ultimately form a model of reality in which the relationship between mind and reality, aka God and matter or religion and science, is made explicit and central. Such is the nature of The CTMU as I understood it

]]> By: Stephen Hughes http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-11/#comment-57066 Stephen Hughes Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:14:49 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-57066 Hello, I would like to know; what is the highest possible score, you can archive with the test, on this page, for each standard deviation. Hello, I would like to know; what is the highest possible score, you can archive with the test, on this page, for each standard deviation.

]]> By: Adam http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-11/#comment-56698 Adam Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:28:16 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-56698 Wow, my IQ test result is same with the result when I was is junior high school 14 years ago. Does it have such precision or just an accident? Wow, my IQ test result is same with the result when I was is junior high school 14 years ago. Does it have such precision or just an accident?

]]> By: Italos Network http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-11/#comment-56694 Italos Network Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:32:36 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-56694 I really wish i had an iq equal to theirs I really dont know what is mine but i believe is good enough to survive I really wish i had an iq equal to theirs

I really dont know what is mine but i believe is good enough to survive

]]> By: Mohad Amarneh http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-11/#comment-56537 Mohad Amarneh Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:34:45 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-56537 Hello every one I think It was hard game to played , but its Okay . I get Above end 140 my question is , Is it the highest level or not . http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=3996604&l=ec97ef25d0&id=693730909 Thanks for all Hello every one
I think It was hard game to played , but its Okay . I get Above end 140 my question is , Is it the highest level or not .

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=3996604&l=ec97ef25d0&id=693730909

Thanks for all

]]> By: Mohad Amarneh http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-11/#comment-56536 Mohad Amarneh Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:29:54 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-56536 Hello every one I think its was Hard game to played , but its okay . I get Above end 140 , my question is , Is it the highest level or not ? Hello every one
I think its was Hard game to played , but its okay . I get Above end 140 , my question is , Is it the highest level or not ?

]]> By: Weston http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-10/#comment-56535 Weston Tue, 16 Feb 2010 01:55:26 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-56535 Kant, really? Despite his altruist philosophy and self-contradictory idea that it's impossible to know reality as a "thing in itself"? He strikes me as the dumbest smart guy who ever lived. Kant, really? Despite his altruist philosophy and self-contradictory idea that it’s impossible to know reality as a “thing in itself”? He strikes me as the dumbest smart guy who ever lived.

]]> By: Thomas Spencer http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-10/#comment-56468 Thomas Spencer Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:17:53 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-56468 that was really cool and educatinal. nice find brother.... that was really cool and educatinal. nice find brother….

]]> By: jon http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-10/#comment-56448 jon Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:56:09 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-56448 I'd be VERY interested where Nikola Tesla's IQ would stack up against all of history. Many of his inventions(that have been suppressed by the gov.) are just becoming relevant today. Some are still way ahead of their time. We owe pretty much any technology out there to him. You can't prove otherwise. :-) I’d be VERY interested where Nikola Tesla’s IQ would stack up against all of history. Many of his inventions(that have been suppressed by the gov.) are just becoming relevant today. Some are still way ahead of their time. We owe pretty much any technology out there to him. You can’t prove otherwise. :-)

]]> By: asif eminov http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-10/#comment-56415 asif eminov Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:52:43 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-56415 My IQ score 136. :) Look this: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=982055&id=1350660802#!/album.php?aid=38115&id=1350660802 My IQ score 136. :) Look this: http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=982055&id=1350660802#!/album.php?aid=38115&id=1350660802

]]> By: hilarina http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-10/#comment-56376 hilarina Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:14:01 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-56376 wow,such a genius. it must b a great person! wow,such a genius.
it must b a great person!

]]> By: ShocK http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-10/#comment-56365 ShocK Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:08:29 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-56365 I totallly agree. Kant is most intelligent man ever IMHO. I totallly agree. Kant is most intelligent man ever IMHO.

]]> By: Alex http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-10/#comment-56277 Alex Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:37:04 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-56277 @james rivers, the european and the scandinavian countries (very cold upper European countries as you referred them as), scored a higher average in a standard IQ test. Whereas Japanese people, especially younger ones, scored the highest average IQ, in the world. America was way down the list. There are many theories why this is so, nevertheless, higher a persons or the average IQ in a society for that matter, reflects in the better living condition. It's not the ONLY factor, but it is a very important one. Of course, politics have a lot to do with this too. Power, money, capitalism etc.. @james rivers, the european and the scandinavian countries (very cold upper European countries as you referred them as), scored a higher average in a standard IQ test. Whereas Japanese people, especially younger ones, scored the highest average IQ, in the world. America was way down the list. There are many theories why this is so, nevertheless, higher a persons or the average IQ in a society for that matter, reflects in the better living condition. It’s not the ONLY factor, but it is a very important one. Of course, politics have a lot to do with this too. Power, money, capitalism etc..

]]> By: Paul Geraŕd http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-10/#comment-56159 Paul Geraŕd Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:33:45 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-56159 Kant died more than 100 years before IQ tests were invented. Yet his IQ is estimated to be 159, not 158, not 160. I remain skeptical. Kant died more than 100 years before IQ tests were invented. Yet his IQ is estimated to be 159, not 158, not 160. I remain skeptical.

]]> By: james rivers http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-10/#comment-56108 james rivers Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:30:15 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-56108 I am inclined to agree with the comment about respecting action. Action is a far better indication of ability as opposed to possibility. In theory a person with a higher IQ could figure out what is better for the average person in terms of life and it's persuits. However, the societies that have created the better living working and life conditions in some of the very cold upper European countries dont seem to have higher IQ's but their actions allowed what seems to be far better living conditions for their citizens. I am inclined to agree with the comment about respecting action. Action is a far better indication of ability as opposed to possibility.
In theory a person with a higher IQ could figure out what is better for the average person in terms of life and it’s persuits. However, the societies that have created the better living working and life conditions in some of the very cold upper European countries dont seem to have higher IQ’s but their actions allowed what seems to be far better living conditions for their citizens.

]]> By: Eric Reid http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-10/#comment-56100 Eric Reid Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:54:47 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-56100 When I was 12 my I took a high level test and scored 140+ When I was 12 my I took a high level test and scored 140+

]]> By: Eric Reid http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/comment-page-10/#comment-56099 Eric Reid Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:53:29 +0000 http://onemansblog.com/2007/11/08/the-massive-list-of-genius-people-with-the-highest-iq/#comment-56099 I took a IQ test a few years ago when I was 12-13 years old and I scored 140+. I took a IQ test a few years ago when I was 12-13 years old and I scored 140+.

]]>