<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Men Actually Have a Monogamy Gene</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onemansblog.com/2008/09/14/men-actually-have-a-monogamy-gene/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onemansblog.com/2008/09/14/men-actually-have-a-monogamy-gene/</link>
	<description>Specialization is for Insects.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:01:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://onemansblog.com/2008/09/14/men-actually-have-a-monogamy-gene/#comment-42360</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemansblog.com/?p=2786#comment-42360</guid>
		<description>Was there any text with this article or just the picture ;) lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was there any text with this article or just the picture ;) lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goran Giertz</title>
		<link>http://onemansblog.com/2008/09/14/men-actually-have-a-monogamy-gene/#comment-42323</link>
		<dc:creator>Goran Giertz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemansblog.com/?p=2786#comment-42323</guid>
		<description>Hahaha! Great one. I think I have multiple copies of RS3 334.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha! Great one. I think I have multiple copies of RS3 334.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R. Jackson</title>
		<link>http://onemansblog.com/2008/09/14/men-actually-have-a-monogamy-gene/#comment-42305</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R. Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemansblog.com/?p=2786#comment-42305</guid>
		<description>I love this post. Being from &#039;Utah&#039; the polygamists capital of the World I can tell you there are a lot of old polygamists farts running around with girls 10, 20 even 30 years their junior.

J.R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this post. Being from &#8216;Utah&#8217; the polygamists capital of the World I can tell you there are a lot of old polygamists farts running around with girls 10, 20 even 30 years their junior.</p>
<p>J.R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Knight</title>
		<link>http://onemansblog.com/2008/09/14/men-actually-have-a-monogamy-gene/#comment-42295</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onemansblog.com/?p=2786#comment-42295</guid>
		<description>Quote:&lt;em&gt; &quot;... so social activity is highly rewarding, leading to monogamy. To see if the same mechanism is at work in people will mean using tissue from &lt;strong&gt;post-mortems&lt;/strong&gt; to map where vasopressin receptors lie, to see if variations are linked to the number of copies of RS3 334.... &quot;&lt;/em&gt;

And (quote again)

&lt;em&gt;A sure sign of whether or not you have RS3 334 genes is if you noticed the photo of hot chicks above. If so, you may have extra copies. If not… &lt;strong&gt;you’re dead.&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;

It seems that you&#039;d have to be.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote:<em> &#8220;&#8230; so social activity is highly rewarding, leading to monogamy. To see if the same mechanism is at work in people will mean using tissue from <strong>post-mortems</strong> to map where vasopressin receptors lie, to see if variations are linked to the number of copies of RS3 334&#8230;. &#8220;</em></p>
<p>And (quote again)</p>
<p><em>A sure sign of whether or not you have RS3 334 genes is if you noticed the photo of hot chicks above. If so, you may have extra copies. If not… <strong>you’re dead.</strong><br />
</em></p>
<p>It seems that you&#8217;d have to be.</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
