Other Random Posts!

20 Comments

  1. You could certainly see your skills within the paintings you write. The arena hopes for even more passionate writers like you who are not afraid to mention how they believe. All the time follow your heart.

  2. “used aerial kites to photograph” … how did they look like? Like a baloon with sails on top of it? … cause that is what I see in the photo I have … unbelivable. If anybody want`s it mailed to him or her let me know.

  3. Well the photos are one and the same photo … with a twist on the one I have … I do not get it. Maybe it was tempered. Does anyone know anything about two versions of the one photo above?

  4. Ooops, this is strange … I have the same photo at home and there is a difference … it really has a flying “thing” on it. This one doesen`t … ?!? I thought it was here to but no, … wait let me have another look at the situation …

  5. OK we all see that the pic is awsome and quite futuristic for those days … I presume. But … what I would like to know more about is the background of the shot, how was it taken, with what camera, … not to mention the flying baloon left in the back … what is that all about?!? Did anyone notice? Looks like they have a pirate flag on it … no, really, what is that???

    Amazing pic!!! Have fun, Goran

  6. I’m afraid that 11,709 x 4,716 is only 0.055 gigapixels. Sorry!

    Fascinating photo, though. Those are the burnt remains of the dome of City Hall to the right of Market St. in the center.

  7. Hi Douglas,
    I noticed your post saying you are using some photography work from the 1920’s by Edward Cochems. My great-great grandmother Anna Cochems and Edward were brother and sister. Making Edward Cochems my great-great uncle. I would love to know more about the work you are doing for your book. Please e-mail me back when you have a chance. I have seen some of his work and I’m very interested in any other info on Edward Cochems.

    Sincerely,

    Meghan Reardon
    [email protected]

  8. Excellent shot of Lawrence — I have two others of his in my book on the ’06 quake, taken three years apart. I’m using 75 panorama photos in a forthcoming book on So Cal history — all taken in the 1920s with a Cirkut camera by Edward Cochems. Great stuff. Best Regards, Douglas Westfall

  9. $15,000 in 1906 dollars, adjusted into 2006 real dollars would be between $346,788.99 and $6,376,993.31, depending upon which index you’d use.

    That’d be a nice chunk of change for a couple of kites and a photograph.

  10. The aftetrmath was unbelievable, more unbelievable the politicians later built large parts of the current San Francisco on reclaimed land which is geologically unsound. The danger will be compounded if another quake hits with enough force.

  11. Thats a scary thought. I actually was in San Fran for the first time last week and checked out P39/Chinatown. Drove up HWY 1. It was amazing.

    Thats a gorgeous picture

Comments are closed.