President Barack Obama's Birth Certificate

Other Random Posts!

12 Comments

  1. Why do you presume he is a kid? I checked his Youtube channel, says it’s a 37 years old man, that does this for a living. While the document might not be fake, he has valid points.

    However I am pretty sure, random people do not work in/for the White House, therefore if they wanted to cover up something, they could have just showed you a .jpg file for some sort of image, instead of giving you access to a PDF file with all of its layers etc.

    However there are some other videos on YouTube, by Infowars they basically do the same. They swear that image is fake.

    Around a month ago however in April 2011, Obama showed a certified long version of the certificate, and announcements in local newspapers in 1961.

    Anyways this is just a technicality. Why is everyone so focused on it. Why not judge him on what he has done or hasn’t done, rather than a piece of paper that really means nothing at this point.

  2. The guy who made this video really doesn’t understand scanner technology. I had to laugh out loud when he said that scanners “detect” all the different colors in ink, and that proves that his mother’s signature was “added by computer”… it’s called antialiasing. And all of the layers (they are groups, not layers) were not part of the original scanned image. He also gets confused between vector and raster graphics. He’s a fool who made a foolish video. To prove this, just wait a little while. When governments misuse PDF technology to incorrectly redact information (e.g. the British and their submarine docs from a couple of weeks ago), it generates headlines. This “discovery” will generate no headlines.

  3. It seems to me they’d never release a fake simply because you can aLWAYS count on someone to disprove a fake. I know it’s weird reasoning, but … in a way it further proves it real (to me anyway, but then again, I never really doubted it heh)

  4. How do you explain then that certain parts of the signature are darkened by a computer and some appear to be scanned? This still seems to be altered to me.

  5. The replaced text acts like OCR software, be it very sophisticated OCR software. The NSA has computers verifying every piece of correspondence that the President receives. Humans don’t do this job anymore. Everything goes through OCR.

    I’ve been looking for other examples of this kind of processing, and I’m finding a great deal of OCR’s docs, but they are all near perfect. The best one that’s similar, that I can find (given I don’t want to spend all day on this) is http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/omb/inforeg/comments/comment2.pdf On page 87 it clearly has very similar issues getting the form correct, as the OCR did with the birth certificate.

    This is not a cover up. Maybe a bit of incompetence. The person doing the scanning should have turned off the OCR.

  6. Here are some other explanations:

    1. Bad file.
    2. Other source you quoted was altered, not the President’s certificate.
    3. State of Hawaii altered it for some reason.
    4. Network slightly corrupted the file.
    5. OCR layering–done all the time in documents.

    The goofy thing is this vast BIRTHER conspiracy is stupid. He has to get a passport. He has to prove that his a citizen and eligible to get on ballots in each state. It has been proven more than 50 times over.

    It does not matter. It is not news.

  7. It’s simple. Since the kid who made this video wasn’t there when the document was generated, he’s not actual insight into the process… so he can speculate all he wants, but it means nothing.

    The White House could have released the certificate as a flat GIF file, and people bitch that it wasn’t animated.

  8. I was reading elsewhere that the layers could have been created by accidentally leaving OCR tech on during the scan process. Not sure that explains everything, though.

Comments are closed.