Sharp 42″ Aquos LCD HDTV Review
Heads up: I wrote this review back in 2006 and I’m keeping it here for the archive. That Sharp Aquos has been discontinued for ages. If you just want to know what to actually buy in this size today, skip to Updated for 2026 at the bottom.
My living room wasn’t bringing the kind of audio visual pleasure it once did, so we had to take the step up to a new HD TV. The problem was, which one to get?
The absolute dimensions for our built in cabinetry dictated that we could go no larger than a 40-42″ flat panel TV, depending on the brand. After doing quite a bit of comparative analysis we finally decided on the Sharp 42″ Aquos LCD (LC-42D62U), which we got at Best Buy.
The Deal
This TV was only released a few weeks ago and Best Buy’s initial pricing was $2,299. Just before Thanksgiving they put it on “Sale” for $1,999. Being a Reward Zone member, and a pretty darn good customer of Best Buy, we had received a coupon good for 12% off the purchase, which brought the pricing down to $1,759.
HINT: Tell the people in the store that you got a 10% or 12% off coupon but left it at home and they’ll give it to you on any large ticket item in the store.
At the time of purchase, a quick search on Price Grabber revealed that I couldn’t even get it online anywhere cheaper, so we went ahead and picked one up.
TV Details
There were four primary characteristics which drew me to this TV:
- With a resolution of 1920 x 1080, this is a full 1080p high definition screen.
- The image quality and screen refresh rate were outstanding in the store.
- The glossy piano-black case on the TV is the best looking out there.
- Nothing less than $1,000 more comes close to the value of this set.
The TV has a Built-In HDTV Tuner, but that’s only good if you’re going to use it with an antenna. To get HD via cable or sattelite you’re going to need a box, or one of the new HD TiVos.
The two HDMI inputs mean that you can either hook an HD tuner and an upconverting (or HD / Blueray) DVD player to it simultaneously, or you can use an HDMI switching A/V receiver.
Real World Performance
After getting the TV home and hooked up to our Time Warner HD DVR I’m pleased to report that the HD picture quality is outstanding. I’d give it an 8.75 out of 10. (I mean, I’ve seen better – but you’re going to have to spend double to triple what this one cost to get it today.) And that is only with a 1080i source. I imagine that 1080p will be even better, but I’ll wait till either Blueray or HD DVD win the standard war before investing in one of those.
Sound quality on this set is adequate, but personally I don’t rely on the internal speakers as we run it through a 5.1 surround system. One thing I found out the hard way is that if you use the digital optical output on the TV to connect it to your receiver, you can no longer use the variable volume control. I mean, the settings will allow you to choose it, but turning the volume up and down on the TV has no effect on the actual volume level. I suppose this is because it’s a digital signal, but it would have been nice of them to tell you this in the manual.
The remote control that comes with the TV is pretty weak in my opinion. I don’t find it to be layed out very intuitively and it’s too large. Luckily I’m not planning on using it as I’ll likely convert to a Logitech Harmony programmable remote in the not too distant future.
Finally, I’ve noticed that non-HD shows seem to have a little more difficult displaying contrast between shades of black or other dark colors. I’m not sure if this is my cable box, the quality of the broadcast, or the actual TV. Anyway, it’s not that bad, but I do notice it. The simple solution is to just watch as much HD content as possible. :-)
Summary
The exceptional picture quality combined with the low price make this HD TV an outstanding bargain. For those that require lots of features such as picture-in-picture or high end internal audio systems you might want to move along to a Sony XBR, but for the money – at this point in time – the Sharp Aquos simply can’t be beat.
Updated for 2026: What to Actually Buy Now
I wrote the review above in 2006, when a 42-inch 1080p LCD for $1,759 was a screaming deal and “HD” was the exciting part. That Aquos is long gone and the whole landscape has flipped. Here’s what actually matters shopping this size today.
What Changed
1080p is dead; 4K is the floor. The real divide now is OLED versus LED/LCD. OLED lights every pixel on its own, so black is truly black and the contrast is spectacular (see RTINGS and Consumer Reports). LED/LCD got far better too, especially “Mini-LED” sets with full-array local dimming that hit serious brightness for less money. And the TV is a computer now: every set ships with streaming built in, the big three being Roku, Google TV, and Amazon Fire TV, so you don’t need a separate box or a cable tuner anymore. If you game, look for HDMI 2.1 and a 120Hz (or faster) panel; for movies, Dolby Vision HDR.
Two I’d Point You At

Premium: the 42-inch LG C5 OLED is about as good as a small TV gets, top-tier picture and gaming (120Hz-plus, HDMI 2.1, Dolby Vision), and it fits tight cabinetry the way that old Aquos did. What Hi-Fi names it the best 42-incher.
Value: a current 43-inch TCL or Hisense Google TV gets you 4K, HDR, and built-in streaming for a fraction of what I paid in 2006. The budget models change every few months, so I’m pointing you at the current crop rather than a specific set that’ll be discontinued by the time you read this.
The Bottom Line
Same rule as 2006: buy the best picture your budget allows and skip the features you won’t use. The difference is the “best picture” bar today is absurdly high even at the cheap end.
One email per post. Twenty years of this, still going. Unsubscribe whenever.



What are the best video settings for the Aquos? I just picked up the 42 ” LCD and can’t get the picture just right yet; any suggestions?
You can get 720i if you hook up a RGB cable (if you have one on your LCD TV) If you have a DVI output on your computer then you could get a DVI to HDMI. The best solution is to get a Full HD capible Video card (1920x1080p) that has either HDMI output or DVI output.
HDMI outputs also allows 5.1 digital sound to your LCD TV in the same cable where as DVI will only send video to your LCD TV. Then you will have to hook up sound from either a 3.5 stereo jack to RCA, unless you have a 3.5 jack input on your LCD TV, then use 3.5 to 3.5.
I connected my aquos using svideo, but the resolution sucks, it does not give me the option to set it to the full 1080 resolution stated. Not sure if it is my video card, s video, or the aquos.
Anyone connect it through HDMI yet? and has anyone had any better luck with Svideo resolution?
I appreciate the reviews that you’ve done for the items that you’ve bought for yourself. I’m definitely thinking that it’s a worthy blog post both from you as well as something that I’m going to consider doing whenever I buy something. It at least contributes to the public wealth of knowledge.
Just curious but what kind of a television did you have before? And what kind of sound system do you have running? (I’m curious because I’ve been looking around for a little bit.)
Hmmmmmmm this is a great idea for the December member prize of the month :)
Kim:)
You have to turn on your secondary monitor setting from the display adapter settings. You should see something for TV/2nd screen etc where u turn on the S video signal since the primary is going out your VGA cable to your monitor.
So i wetnt to tiger diect and bought the s video interconnect cable, since my video card only has a RGB input and a svideo. they said it would work b/c i had that hook up on th back of my 42 sharp and on my computer….. well when i went home i hooked it up.. turned in my TV and switched the input to s video, which i was supposed to do. it did’ent work.. no picture. i dont know what to do. Any suggestions??
yea ill do that i might have to get another video card tho , thanks
It doesn’t have an RGB input, but if you have HDMI or Component outputs on your video card I suppose you could use it. And it would be one bad ass monitor! :-)
John
can i use the 42′ sharp as a monitor?? i see no input for the computer cable
Then the Man has to go where no man has gone before…
http://memory-alpha.org/en/images/a/a4/USS_Enterprise-D,_past,_present_and_future.jpg
I’m not sure Terry. I don’t see the benefit to downgrading from my current monitor. :-)
http://www.ocregister.com/blog/gadgetress/uploaded_images/HWspace-783745.gif
If I can make a suggestion for a new computer monitor for the man…
http://tinyurl.com/7zr8s