Other Random Posts!

18 Comments

  1. Definitely agree John. How sucks MFA sites are. Never think what are in their mind since they hve nothin to offer to their visitor. It’s just another spammy site which make search engine dirty meanwhile another useful sites hard to get into the search engine.

  2. I completely agree…I hate sites that are crawling with adsense. Fair enough, the inexperienced user will click on the ads but the regular internet user will simply skip to the next site and that’s not what you want. I’d rather have an experience PC user on my site than a noob; although everyone is welcome lol.

  3. Yeah you’re right… putting adds all over the place is not very interesting for your users. Also you destroy your work by making it spammy

  4. I don’t click on banner ads ever! Those deals are not worth it to me and yes it destroys the page’s credibility.

  5. Totally agree with you John. Most people unfortunately have started blogging just for the money it brings in hence the creation of a niche like Make Money Online and themes for it too. Things were better when people blogged just for the love of blogging and because they had something they wanted to speak about and speak out and just share it with the world. Now blogging has become so commercialized…

  6. Google used to be a lot stricter when the Adsense first began but it’s not so anymore(imho). You can have a 2-3 page MFA website and still join Adsense nowadays.

  7. I simply felt the urge to click the google add that comes right after the article. I’ve read a few of other articles on the site and this was the only one I noticed with Adsense adds.

    I absolutely agree with you when it comes to MFA sites as you call them. But I think you should also monetize this site a little bit better than it is right now. Just my two cents…

    You are putting your time on it, you might as well make some money doing it ;)

  8. Actually you can earn a fair bit, have a snoop at sitepoint marketplace and garryconns site, you can see how profitable it can be

  9. Adsense is a good money maker and arguably the bes ppc platform, so they will ALWAYS be people trying to use t to its maximum potential.

    Some of these people will be good at making MFA sites and you will not be able to tell the difference. Others will not be and will result in sites as the above.

    After all if you do keyword research and have adsense on your site. It is arguably a MFA site.

  10. Not to defend a hideous corporate behemoth, but it’s not like Google doesn’t have *any* constraints on its AdSense publishers. For starters, webmasters are supposed to limit their Google ads to three ad blocks per page. Those who violate this rule risk losing their affiliation.

    I think this is a self-regulating problem. Those sites that overuse advertising, whether it’s Google’s or anybody else’s, will be the object of a backlash (like your own post, for example), and risk limiting their readership to those who are extremely tolerant of overloaded pages.

    Makes me wonder if loading up a web page with all those ads actually works. In which case, all the indignation in the world isn’t likely to persuade anyone away from it.

    Anyway, interesting thoughts there.

  11. Hey, thanks for the kind words Jerry. ;-)

    I might have been unclear about what I would like from Google… I don’t want them approving content; I just want them to exercise some control over who they allow to use/abuse the AdWords system.

    Many advertising firms review the content of the site before they allow it into the ad network. But Google allows anyone and their dog to slap AdWords on a site. With no QC whatsoever, they are in essence monitizing their own referral traffic.

    What happens is, Google is incented to actually send traffic to MFA sites. On one end they show the advertisers that their ads are being viewed, and on the other end they collect money!

    If you put a team in place to do some quality checks on the content and boot people out of the AdWords program who ruin the Web experience for visitors, you might see a slowdown in the proliferation of such sites.

    One way or another though… I just know MFA sites suck! ;-)

    John

  12. Love ya, John P., but think for a minute about what you’re saying. Do you really want Google approving content? The people who control what you see when you do a web search actually telling you what you can and cannot post? That thought truly frightens me.

    I’d rather deal with a few spammy sites than give one institution that much control over the Internet.

    Thanks — yours is one of my go-to blogs every morning.

Comments are closed.