Other Random Posts!

9 Comments

  1. To further enhance the impressions from the videos – especially the sports car one: Usually, only every fifth or even tenth round is a tracer. Still, you nearly get the laser beam effect.

  2. Perhaps Mr. Dillon should point out the discrepancy between the premier Gatling Gun circa 1861, which was not an aerial weapon, and the current models.

  3. They don’t need to fire it very long. If some person approaches the presidential motorcade with a gun they will fire every Gatling gun at him until he resembles sliced cheese. And if attacked by massed formations or aircraft makes an excellent volley of lead. My only problem being, what in the hell is the government thinking having a weapon like that equiped on a vehicle that will probably be traveling through densely urban areas, the fact is if fired it will probably inflict a lot of civilian casualties. Why don’t they an electic fired metal storm type, that way they won’t have to compensate for recoil and the bullets won’t move to far off target I can imagine the moment these weapons are used in the context of defense of the president there is going to be a long series of questions about the 30-40 other people hit by the impressive firepower.

  4. As a person with military experience (USMC), and experience handling some impressive firepower, I think that I can safely say that the M134 is a BAMF.

Comments are closed.